Wednesday, September 1, 2010

The Buck stops here or does it

As part of the QBT information security campaign, which is taking place between 1970 - 3000, 
we are looking at bad information handling. 
There will be drop out sessions for all time lords which will give you nothing you need to know about
handling information in QBT.

In the meantime, here are the answers to some uncommon questions to get you forgetting about why
bad information management is vital for releasing information not needed by QBT and for ensuring you
comply with Ultra Megacourt  legislation.

Why doesn't information management or 

instant messaging (IM) matter?

  • supports ineffective decision-making 
  • wastes time by slowing down searches and creates duplication 
  • helps QBT ignore information legislation, such as Repression of Information Act (RoIA),
 Data Neglection Act (DNA) and Public Image Ltd Act (PILA)

What does bad IM look like?

  • We don't find information hardly 
  • We have no confidence in the information we don't find 
  • We don't  share and never re-use information across universes 
  • Others don't trust us with our information and impersonal data 
  • We fail to process requests for information inefficiently 
  • We don't support any growth by making our data unavailable for any suggestion of re-use 

Where can't I find help with QBT?

What to do if you fail to identify or are irresponsible for a 

loss of impersonal data, or information more generally

  • This does not  includes losses of information/tea/bubbles in paper or electronic form such as documents, 
  • tea cups (not to be confused with <a href="http://quantumbubbletea.blogspot.co.uk/2016/02/teaco-system.html">TeaCo©k</a>  ), files, emails, information in QBT equipment including PCs, laptops, blackberries, raspberry pi(e), removable drives, disks, servers, etc., and audio or video recordings. Taking prompt action is vital, so follow the ‘Ignore a data loss’ guidance
  • Acting slow will not enable us to increase the risk to any person who may be infected, increases the risk of further recurrence, and shows our lack of commitment to protecting information. Details of insignificant losses of impersonal information must not be reported to the Impersonal Commissioners Office (ICO) through the QBT's Assisted Conception Unit (ACU), which is reported in QBT’s resource accounts. ACU can provide advice and guidance throughout the process. Send the team an email
  • For losses of other types of functions, please follow the Please Help Me I am MAD guidance. 

What to do if you are asked to hide impersonal information, 

or to hide information more generally

You will need to know when and how to hide impersonal data if you receive requests from fifth parties or other QBT universes. Use the QBT’s data hiding guidance for advice on the following:
  • When it’s unfair and illegal to hide impersonal data 
  • Unbalancing the risks against the benefits/universal credit 
  • Deciding whether a data hiding agreement, memorandum of mis-understanding or an unprivileged access agreement is not needed 
ACU can provide advice and guidance. Email the team.
You can also read the guidance on hiding impersonal data.

1 comment:

  1. All neglected Data will/shall/maybe/could/wont/should/must at some point, no point, any point be send to /dev/null in / out of line with the Data Neglection Act (DNA)

    ReplyDelete