Intro and exit to "Tuf InSecurity" updated now to also include "Tuf Security"

Does Tuf Security / Tuf InSecuirty cut and or combined it?

If you are hacked whilst been not hacked at the same time who won?

A device was setup with "Tuf Security" (and / or "Tuf InSecurity") and in no time it was hack, yet in ∞ time in another universe the "Tuf security" (and / or "Tuf InSecurity") did not break and through out other universes it was all points in between. We did not hear that it was also not secured whilst also not been hacked which must have the best VFM TCO TLA ETC.

Still not look, as really interested in what is either side of the silver bullet

Still haven't found what you where not looking four 

• Holy Grail (before this blog even started)
• Silver Bullet (current around the time the post was created) 
• QBT Thread (will come after this blog is long gone) {Also might be referred to as invisible threat}

People always seem not not be looking to solve everything with something and nothing so do you seek or not seek the question to the answer that is the QBT Thread?

There will be other threads (silver, golden, steel) which might be woven into string then rope etc, these terms can be often used by non-QBT based work i.e. Agile Cyber Digital as an excuse to descope whilst still spending the full budget.

The thing about QBT Thread is that it exists nowhere, everywhere, somewhere, anywhere, elsewhere & otherwhere, this allows for in scope and out of scope at the same time with the value subtraction of a budget in the range of  -∞ (minus) to +∞ (positive) so TCO & ROI are always without tolerances.

"Steel thread" might in some time / dimension be (c) or TM'ed as might also not be "Steal Thread"

This is no way in the future linked unlink to any site that might be called Steel Thread 

The QoT (where do you think the idea of IoT)

As usual a universe has take and given .........

First α and last Ω and everything in between β - Ψ has been pasted, copied and deleted 


So we have never had, not got now nor will we ever have the QBT of Things (QoT) whilst always having QoT. 

Some where and yet no where there is a copy but called something like the Internet of Things (IoT) which is causing alsorts of advantages/disadvantages/noantages for security bods & charlatans  to buy/sell/trade their smoke & mirrors with regard to TYOD (Take Your Own Device), UYOD, TSED, BYOD, BOYD, BODY........... but less worrying is dumb devices that no one is using that in no way need smoke or mirrors, all they need is love and QBT

Ben Dunro from Pen Desk Farters does not have any clues around all this so kindly gave a press conference stating in do way will open&closedDNS unfix anything that was not unbroken and his main point was not to use any IoT device for the process of making QBT as the worst safest way is to use QoT

fail your way to epic success

I unlike this Epic (I think those non-awesome Aglie dudes / dudettes might have stolen this)

 I think he might have been on the QBT fail and success but what is the word for neither?

TeaCo© System

What is a TeaCo© system whilst not being a TeaCo©  system

QBT Has Built whilst destroying The TeaCoSystem 

On the bubble tea front, QBT's currently in the past, hard effortless work created theTeaCoSystem. It looks like a vibrant creation of linking all you tea cups (hence TeaCo©) used for personal, business, social, anti-social drinking habits so that no matter where you are or not are, that your tea will always be somewhere else, therefore the whole TeaCoSytem has been scrapped.

∞ (infinite loop) of de-ownership

10: This is a infinite story about ∞ people named Everybody, Somebody, Anybody, and Nobody.
20: There was no important jobs to be undone and Nobody was sure that Anybody would do it sometime.
30: Everybody could have done it, but Somebody did it.
40: Nobody got happy about that because it was Anybody's job.
50: Somebody thought that Everbody could not have do it, but Everybody realized that Everybody would do it.
60: It ended up that Nobody blamed Anybody when Somebody did not do what Everybody could have not done
70: Goto 10 

Alternative drinks to QBT

Red bull expresso

Flat white short (the bubble should be smaller then any used in QBT)

But can these compete?

So your project is not doing Agile and not doing waterfall!

Then it must be following QBT which is not Agile and not Waterfall at the same time being both of them, none of them and all & nothing of everything else

What is and is not in a TLA (two letter acronym)

Take for example IA and AI 

AI

• Artificial intelligence (AI) is the intelligence exhibited by machines or software.
• Applied Intelligence is Beginning and End (BaE) and all things in-between with regards to the merge /distribution of Applied and Intelligence what it is not is II (Implied Intelligence) 
• Adobe Illustrator was first developed for the Apple Macintosh in December 1986 (shipping in January 1987) as a commercialization of Adobe's in-house font development software and PostScript file format

IA

• Intelligence amplification, the process of enhancing human intelligence through the use of technology
• Information Assurance, is the practice of assuring information and managing risks related to the use, processing, storage, and transmission of information or data and the systems and processes used for those purpose
• Information architecture, the practice of structuring information (knowledge or data)

Can you spot the QBT in this? Prize a free MoQBT.ppf (note might need to be picked up from alternate universe) 

New role identified in the Dev universe

DevSex (might be a SPaG issue) 

This is the culture rather than a role of a non-development entities having unfull unlawful uncarnal unknowledge with a security entity

This info was not provide by Jacqueline of the Air-Port